Відео

Should have a million views. Still more enlightenment needed about their hatred of the West and the regimes of the Middle East.

UNO 💘 THE, SON OF 9 GOD KHUDA Sa ❤️ UN's WORLD'SC1 UNO's Happy Sunday's I'M allah ❤️

This did not age well.

Anthony Albanese was ate Corruption Birbe and All Policy maked Benefit for League Satans Mafia Communists Socialism Terror Racist Extreme Chinazi ,Vietnazi , Russnazi , North Korea Nazi , Cuba Nazi , Venezuela Nazi, Iran Nazi. Canbera only Prioritized Approved VISA for Communism Parties , Communism Family. Members Communist Vietnam , China , Russia were not to Knew and Can not Spell Alphabet But They Were Won VISA Because AMBASSY and CONSULATE were ate Corruption Birbe. 04 Years Then add on Australia Citizenship But Communists Don't Care Because Anthony Albanese and Canbera do Direct for They only need They had Life in Australia for One Year. Civilian Vietnamese not Communism , not Socialism and Want go to Australia for The Life with Jobs and But Canbera were Obligatory English 5.0 and Must have Money 100,000 USD to 1000,000 USD and Than More. But The Poor Vietnamese Haven't got Those Big Money and not English 5.0 Then Haven't got PASSPORT , VISA , TICKET AIR PLANE. on The Century 21 And Vietnamese were Continue Chose Ran out of Mafia Communist Socialism Terror Vietnazi Party by Boat and go to USA , Australia , Canada , Norway , United Kingdom , EU. Because Mafia Communist Socialism Terror Vietnazi Party were ate Corruption Birbe and Rob Asset , SUPPRESS Civilian Vietnamese not Communism , not Socialism. Mafia Communist Socialism Terror Vietnazi Party were Transport Assest Rob of Citizens Vietnam to Nations Freedom and Nations Freedom did Money Lawdering for Mafia Communist Socialism Terror Vietnazi Party. Vietnazi Party were Received The Help of Canbera and Nations Freedom by Method Made The Poor Civilian Yellow Vietnamese Will become The Criminal by Deny Refugee Communist Socialism. They did Racist to The Yellow Civilian Vietnamese When The African go to Australia by Boat on The Sea then Received and Approved Citizenship. But Civilian Yellow Vietnamese go to Austrialia by Boat on The Ocean then Canbera Said immigrant illegal and ABF were Arrest and take Return Mafia Communist Socialism Terror Vietnazi Party. Anthony Albanese and Canbera Maked Australia Became Communism Nation and They Sold Australia for Chinazi. All NATIONS FREEDOM and UNITED NATIONS DID PERFORM POLICY RACIST CIVILIAN YELLOW VIETNAMESE NOT COMMUNISM , NOT SOCIALISM. THEY MAKE AUSTRIALIA BECOME COLONY OF CHINAZI.

The GDP per capita graph is so much out of scale. Looks like GDP (Bangladesh) is twice GDP (China), which is not the case as the same data suggests. But I very much doubt the data too. The World Bank data shows at constant price GDP China was 312 USD and Bangladesh was 216. This makes complete sense to me as someone who researches India and China on a comparative scale. Of course the massive divergence between South Asia and China happened from the 1990s, but China had already taken a lead by 1970s.

One of the most undemocratic organizations in the world, promote democracy? They can start with themselves.

The first thing is for Norway 🇳🇴 sovereign fund to stop investing in anti democratic countries and weapons manufacturers.Let’s lead by example As they say put your Money where your mouth is.

Every Brit !!! Did he not know the results of the referendum. I voted out , I have no issues with the uk being a little player in the world. Middle class clap trap . And I listen to lots of the programs he makes.

En veldig interessant konferanse. Gode innspill. Det er veldig mye kritikk man kan komme med og. (1) En kritikk er at man ikke tar inn over seg de facto skjulte operasjoner. USA har, ifølge Lindsey A. O'Rourke i boken Covert Regime Change: America's Secret Cold War (2018), utført 64 skjulte operasjoner og 6 åpenlyse («overt») intervensjoner under den kalde krigen, ofte under dekke av sikkerhetshensyn og "plausible deniability". De har støttet alt fra fascister, militære juntaer, diktatorer, ettpartiregimer, jihadister osv. for å motarbeide venstreorienterte krefter («kommunismen"). Faktisk også innblandinger i demokratiske prosesser i f.eks. Japan, Frankrike og Italia. Så amerikanerne har da virkelig vært nummer én i å motarbeide den FN-baserte internasjonale orden! Hvorfor er det (forenklet sagt) Vesten mot resten i dag? Kanskje tenkte litt over hva slags konsekvensner amerikansk innblanding har hatt i andre land? USA er hyperaggressivt! Les og analyser boka og forfølg fotnotene. Dette hører i hvert fall med i en diskusjon som vi i Vesten egentlig ikke hører noe om. (2) Ifølge Noam Chomsky er det to former for internasjonale ordener: den amerikanske formen for en "regelbasert orden", som betyr at verden må følge de amerikanske pålagte reglene, eller FNs form for en internasjonal orden basert på FN-pakten (1945). USA vil gjerne at verden skal vedta sine regler, mens verden er mer opptatt av å bygge prosedyrer som er forankret i dokumentet som har størst konsensus av noe dokument noensinne, som er FN-pakten. (Det hører med at USA har så å si ikke ratifisert noen av FN-konvensjonene.) Videre sier Chomsky at på 1990-tallet med den amerikanske unipolariteten kom det en ny doktrine kalt Right to protect, eller R2P. Det er to versjoner av R2P. En versjon er den offisielle FN-versjonen, som ble utarbeidet av en FNs generalforsamlings-resolusjon fra 2006. Hvis det er intern undertrykkelse i et land og det er press for en intervensjon, kan ingen bruk av militær makt utenfra brukes uten en fullmakt fra Sikkerhetsrådet. Den andre versjonen kommer fra en kanadisk kommisjon ledet av Gareth Evans. Den er nesten nøyaktig den samme som den offisielle versjonen, med en nøkkelforskjell. Det er en paragraf i den som sier at regionale militære allianser kan utføre militære intervensjoner i sin egen region uten fullmakt fra FNs sikkerhetsråd. Militæralliansen NATO, som i forlengelse av avsnittet om en USA-styrt regelbasert verden, er et instrument for en slik verdensorden. Så R2P betyr å holde seg til FN-pakten med ett unntak, som er at NATO kan invadere og ødelegge et hvilket som helst land den vil. Dette utsagnet om at det ikke finnes interessesfærer i dag er jo helt absurd. F.eks. i 2019 erklærte Trumps tidligere National Security Advisor, John Bolton, at Monroe-doktrinen lever i beste velgående. Og det var nok av advarsler om NATOs utvidelse og hvordan det vil oppleves av andre. Her det tradisjonelle sikkerhetsdillemmaet i internasjonal relasjoner: Det vi opplever som økt sikkerhet går på bekostning av andres (og vice versa). William Burns i et memo til Condoleezza Rice i 2008: "Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian elite (not just Putin). In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players, from knuckle-draggers in the dark recessers of the Kremlin to Putin's sharpest liberal critics, I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.” (3) Angående Ukraina-krigen: Hvis man virkelig bryr seg om menneskerettigheter og liberale verdier, hvorfor støttet man ikke for fullt alvor Minsk-2? Hvorfor gjør man ikke mer for å få til forhandlinger? Tvert imot eskalerer NATO-landene krigen ytterligere i henhold til USAs forsvarsminister L. Austins uttalte mål om å "svekke Russland i Ukraina". Ifølge Nicolai Petro i The Tragedy of Ukraine: What Classical Greek Tragedy Can Teach Us About Conflict Resolution (2022), forpliktet Minsk-2 både regjeringen i Kiev og opprørerne i Donbass til direkte forhandlinger med sikte på å institusjonalisere kulturell pluralisme i Ukraina. Men parlamentet i Kiev vedtok samtidig en lov om gjenoppretting av statens suverenitet (lov 7163). Den la ut en strategi som var vesentlig i strid med Minsk-avtalene; den gjorde med andre ord implementeringen av Minsk-2 umulig under ukrainsk lov. Frankrike, Tyskland og Russland gikk alle med på Morel-planen, Sejdik-initiativet, Steinmeier-formelen og Clusters-tilnærmingen. Ukraina gjorde det ikke. Hvorfor? (Nå ser bort ifra at Merkel og Hollande, så vel som Porosjenko, har alle i senere tid sagt at Minsk-2 bare var ment for å gi Ukrainerne tid til å ruste opp.) Det oppstår konflikter om en befolkning - demos - ikke er overlappende med befolkningens identitetsbærende kjennetegn - etnos. Når myndighetene i Kiev ikke ratifiserer forpliktelsene i Minsk-2, tvert imot motarbeider det, samtidig begrenset elementære rettigheter som retten til å bruke ens morsmål, ytringsfriheten og religionsfrihet ovenfor en stor andel av sin egen populasjon, blir det fort oppskrift på konflikt. Den galiciske (monistiske) ukrainske identiteten fikk monopol post-Maidan. Problemet er at det er en «negativ» nasjonalisme, i betydning definert som antitese (her mot malorossiya og russisk kultur). Janukovitsj var demokratisk valgt president, enten man liker det eller ikke har ikke noe med saken å gjøre. Under Maidan tilbød han et tidlig presidentvalg. Det ble avvist av Maidan-radikale som stormet parlamentet. I strid med riksrettsprosedyrene fastsatt i den ukrainske grunnloven, stemte man for å fjerne Janukovitsj fra vervet. Så hevder man altså at Ukraina er et demokrati som kjemper mot autokrati? Demokrati innebærer noen prinsipper: (1) Ytringsfrihet og forsamlingsfrihet; (2) Pressefrihet; (3) Frihet til å organisere partier, kandidater og kampanje for vervet; (4) Fravær av statlig terror og et klima av frykt. Ingenting av dette var tilfellet i Ukraina post-Maidan! Hvorfor i alle dager støtter vi kulturelle monister i Ukraina framfor et pluralistisk samfunn når vi samtidig advokerer for menneskerettigheter og demokrati? Det gir ingen mening ... (4) Hvorfor har vi et så ekstremt marginalisert ordskifte? Hver dag i massemediene er det de samme utvalgte oberstene og NATO-personell som kommer med sine analyser. Jamfør Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (1988) er det ikke det at de kommer med direkte løgner, men snarere delsannheter. De sier kun A og ikke B. For å kontekstualisere det som sies, for å kunne identifisere B, må man ha mye kompetanse om temaet, langt utover det som kommer frem. Ifølge Graham Majin i Truthophobia: How the Boomers Broke Journalism: The Story of the Death of Impartial and Objective News (2023) har journalistikken beveget seg i å bli mer narrativdrevet for å fremme en spesifikk sak om universalisme (jf. den liberale ordenen) enn å strebe etter objektive nyheter. Alt dette og mer gjør at vi, Vesten, står alene mot resten. Det er ikke sånn at det globale sør heier på Russland og ønsker slike folkestridige invasjoner velkommen, men folkeretten har da vitterlig Vesten undergravd i lang tid allerede! Så kan man reflektere over hvorfor oppstår autokratier? Mye tyder på at ytre trusler dreier et samfunn i mer autokratisk retning, også her hjemme! Hvorfor kunne ikke Europa vært en diplomatisk og økonomisk stormakt som kunne fungert som en brobygger i stedet for å bidra til økt militarisering og en ny blokkinndeling? Vi burde strebet etter å ha et godt forhold både øst og vest. Hvor skal Europa få sin energi fra f.eks.? Vijay Prashad påpekte at Europa mye grunnet USA har mistet sine tre viktigste energileverandører: Russland, Iran og Libya. Europeisk lederskap virker ikke å ivareta europeiske borgeres interesser; Europa virker ikke å være suverene og tar selvstendige avgjørelser. I stedet binder vi oss til en synkende skute, som er USA. USA burde investert mye mer i sine egne borgere, faktisk stått for sine egne verdier, og ikke ha 800+ militærbaser verden over og bedrive innblandinger og skjulte operasjoner overalt (med andre ord imperialisme). Sånn sett kunne USA faktisk vært den skinnende byen på høyden, faktisk levd opp til sine verdier de advokerer verden over, som andre kunne ta lærdom av. I stedet vokser jo prekariatet over hele Vesten! Som antagelig er litt av årsakene til at også populisme i Vesten har medhold i dag. Takk for oppmerksomheten! En lang post.

DOWNVOTED these lies. The democratic decline is obviously in Brussels. Your so-called International Affairs is nothing but BS.

Please dont tell me that "civil society" = Open society

Hungarian government does not follow the liberal left, what you call center, but what the Hungarian people want. I think that is called democracy.

I bet she means the same wonderful "rule of law" and "human rights" that made the government try to stop the National Conservative congress in Brussels a week ago.

Stateism is everywhere. Look at the USA. They have built their stateism around the corporate world. And anyone who differs from the view of the state would be condemned by the corporate world and they cant hold make businesses or get jobs in the USA. We have seen the abuse of the words antisemitism and different phobias like homophobia being used in the USA to dispose of those who do not serve the interests of the deep state and American government. Democracy is an illusion and does not allow for individual views. You have shared a lot of truths about Putinism, but in the end, your analysis is biased, and you are analyzing Putin using the democratic lens. You are not analyzing Putin as Putin.

Hold Norge nøytralt! Alle NATO tilhengere er landssvikere/søppel.

Meget bra konferanse. NUPI 🐏

地元政府よ、サヘルにショベルカーとトラクターと散水車を導入して植林活動だけでなく、水源を掘り起こして井戸と大きな水場と川と水路を作って下さい‼️

Porky Swine !!!

Professor swine is very good

What would be the future geopolitical landscape of middle estate? How big powers protect human rights in case of conflict?

I’m so glad that I found your channel. I was a fundamentalist Christian but left the church when it became so extreme.

In short they live a cultish live, even deadly suicidal like bound to eliminate human race kind of cult. Religion gone haywire... as lots of good religions ... there are also lots if crazy mad one like these

tek yönlü bir program olmuş orada bir Türk konuşmacı da olmalıydı

'The Horn of Africa: Its strategic importance for Europe, the Gulf States and beyond' So, the practical forms of this strategic importance of the Horn of Africa for Europe, the Gulf States and beyond are the following? It must be a very messy strategic importance where the lives of millions are excluded from that strategic importance. Each decade brings its string of miseries, humans' miseries. ua-cam.com/video/6SVByPiF6iQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/5jj58vOk0IA/v-deo.html www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i11jN NGTV4 ua-cam.com/video/WB7jUMJGycw/v-deo.html

Abkhazia is independent. It is a shame that most countryes see them just through their relation to Russia

2:25 he starts lying⏫those in Benghazi who only green,peacefvl Jewish Gaddafi was defending his nation were artificially intelligent,people hating genocidal Hogwarts waving red🌙black K-9 Astarte's flag🔺Those terrorists also painted graffiti,swastikas,rioted,bank robbed,cvt Africans throats,looted➕dismembered hvmans⚠Most Misfits described above were hAmAs➕+ from gAzA,Afghanistan,qAtAr etc,sponsored by instiTVtions that wanted investors cheering stock markets higher by plvndering Libya's trillions while loyalists were bvsy protecting Blacks,ethnic minorities from qvad witching Lilith worshipping wiccan Libyan Rebels⚠🔫🐺✌📈

😕 *promosm*

The moderator was Marianne Riddervold, not Pernille. The screen originally had 24.2.2023 but I saw the error and Åsmund incredibly got it corrected at the last minute. 🙂 I'm American over here and 76, and I can make sense of some written Norwegian, but verbal is still just static to me. (I'm the balding, white-haired guy down there in front.) When Qs&As came, I complimented Endre on his graphics, and asked if I could ask my question in "NATO English" 😈 as I do when a NATO-related event is in Norwegian. I began my question pointing out his expertise on the environment and that the environment is in a death spiral and we have run out of TIME to internationally unite to deal with the crisis. (I forgot to mention the excellent analogy of the Ukraine War being fools fighting over deck chairs on our sinking/submerging Titanic/environment.) The emphasis of his talk was on Norwegian public opinion, so I asked why the Greens in Norway supporting us (Peace Prize Norway) continuing to support with weapons continuing the war, rather than the higher priority of the environment. He went ahead and answered in Norwegian - maybe he's as uncommunicative in English as I am in norsk, but we're in Norway, so .... - so I didn't understand anything he said to answer. I will point out that Norwegian support may be so high for NATO because NATO isn't (yet?) in the Ukraine war and taking casualties. Endre noted that Finnmark was the least enthused region about NATO. Since the kommune division of Finnmark from Tromsø, a new kommune leader has taken over, and he just yesterday invited Zelensky up there for WW2 commemoration instead of Russians. (Maybe he hadn't hear about Zelensky giving a standing ovation to a veteran of the genocidal 14th SS Galician Division in Canadian Parliament a couple weeks ago.) How this goes over with Finnmarkers I question, but it *is* a shallow politician's cheap anti-Russian provocation and a deep insult to those Russian soldiers who gave their *lives* to liberate Norwegian territory in 1944-45.

THANK YOU SIR FOR caring about famined People of Ethiopia. Ethiopia and Eritrea were ruled by the AMHARA ETHNIC GROUP who are cruel, GENOCIDAL, and DICTATORIAL who have no brain left in how to build a country where peace and prosperity is available. Since TPLF AND EPLF, who are from the TIGRE ethnic group who got hold of both countries, a lot of economic and human development has taking place.

Liberalism now gives standing ovations to Nazis

Absolutely brilliant. Thank you Dr Anthea Butler. You are deeply appreciated.

Hahaha 😊. Don't be a softcock weak minded fool .stand strong 😊

I will try to get some vegan options we have here over there

Saying so much and still saying nothing. Give me data. Stopped at 15 minutes.

21:42

冰淇凌

Those who lost their jobs to global competition voted leave.

you so much it's not my friend is my family you so much my family

Professor Thunander har NATO ubåtar i sitt navel ludd.

Europe stay away from Africa let African government do it themselves

It’s interesting to listen to this following recent developments (2023)

I'm not convinced by the moderator. I think her line has been falsified since 2022 as well. Muscovy only respects strength. The admiral was right.

This is 3 years ago. History since 2022 has falsified much of his arguments.

Putin doesn't want to revive the Soviet Union specifically. He's an imperialist. His view of the Soviet Union is that it was a Russian empire. That's what he wants.

Galeotti doesn't particularly like the comparisons between Putin and Hitler. Actually, the way Galeotti describes Putin's system is very close to how Hitler's worked ("working towards the Führer" is a central theme in Ian Kershaw's Hitler biography).

Muscovy's greatness as a birthright, as the natural order of things, is not unique to Putin. It is central to Muscovite culture and identity. That is why the Rape of Ukraine is popular among Muscovites.

Always useful to listen to Galeotti. However, Muscovite history, and the history of the menace of Muscovy to its neighbours, did not start with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union is just one iteration of Muscovy. Putin and his regime is not the cause of our problem with Muscovy. They are a symptom of a more fundamental issue.

Is it me or there is a cut in the middle of the video ?

Putin saved Russia from being looted by the West and they’ve been whining about it ever since.

He's wrong about the history: The first Arab /Muslim constitution came into effect on 26 April 1861 (not 1862) @9:38. Tunis liberated its slaves in 1846 NOT 1863 (maybe confusing dates with Lincoln's US Emancipation Proclamation in 1863?) @9:46..The Constitutional Assembly was also 1861 (not 1862).